July 5, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

Locke v. Davey

States may exclude religion from generally available benefits without violating the Free Exercise Clause.

Cite This Case
Locke v. Davey, 540 U.S. 712 (2004).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Locke v. Davey, 540 U.S. 712 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2004). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/locke-v-davey/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Locke v. Davey (540 U.S. 712) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2004] — States may exclude religion from generally available benefits without violating the Free Exercise Clause. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/locke-v-davey/, accessed July 5, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 540 U.S. 712 Year: 2004 Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Holding: States may exclude religion from generally available benefits without violating the Free Exercise Clause.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Locke v. Davey (540 U.S. 712) is a Education case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2004. The court held that states may exclude religion from generally available benefits without violating the Free Exercise Clause.