Marbury v. Madison

Q: What court decided Madison?

Marbury v. Madison was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1803.

Q: What is the citation for Madison?

The official citation for Marbury v. Madison is 5 U.S. 137.

Q: What legal issues are involved in Madison?

Marbury v. Madison involves the following religious liberty issues: Church & State.

Established the principle of judicial review, making the Supreme Court the final arbiter of constitutional interpretation.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026 1 min read

Cite This Case

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).

✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1803). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/marbury/

✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

Marbury v. Madison (5 U.S. 137) [U.S. Supreme Court, 1803] — Established the principle of judicial review, making the Supreme Court the final arbiter of constitutional interpretation. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/marbury/, accessed July 4, 2026).

✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

Citation: 5 U.S. 137 Year: 1803 Court: U.S. Supreme Court

Church & State

Holding: Established the principle of judicial review, making the Supreme Court the final arbiter of constitutional interpretation.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📄 Read Opinion Article link

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 Oyez opinion

In Defense of Separation January 6, 2011

Cited as context
Supremacy Clause Prevents States from Ignoring Supreme Court Decisions October 30, 2015

Cited as context 📎 Oyez opinion

Marbury v. Madison (5 U.S. 137) is a Church & State case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1803. The court held that established the principle of judicial review, making the Supreme Court the final arbiter of constitutional interpretation.