Cite This Case
Russo v. June Medical Services, No. 18-1323; 18-1460 (U.S. 2020).
✓ Copied!
Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Russo v. June Medical Services, No. 18-1323; 18-1460 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2020). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/russo-v-june-medical-services/
✓ Copied!
For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Russo v. June Medical Services (No. 18-1323; 18-1460) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2020] — The Supreme Court considered whether doctors have standing to challenge a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at local hospitals. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/russo-v-june-medical-services/, accessed April 14, 2026).
✓ Copied!
For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Holding: The Supreme Court considered whether doctors have standing to challenge a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at local hospitals.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Official Documents
Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV
Russo v. June Medical Services (No. 18-1323; 18-1460) is a Healthcare & Conscience case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2020. The court held that the Supreme Court considered whether doctors have standing to challenge a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at local hospitals. The case resulted in a Pending outcome.