July 21, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

Russo v. June Medical Services

The Supreme Court considered whether doctors have standing to challenge a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at local hospitals.

Cite This Case
Russo v. June Medical Services, No. 18-1323; 18-1460 (U.S. 2020).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Russo v. June Medical Services, No. 18-1323; 18-1460 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2020). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/russo-v-june-medical-services/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Russo v. June Medical Services (No. 18-1323; 18-1460) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2020] — The Supreme Court considered whether doctors have standing to challenge a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at local hospitals. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/russo-v-june-medical-services/, accessed July 21, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: No. 18-1323; 18-1460 Year: 2020 Court: U.S. Supreme Court Outcome: Pending
Holding: The Supreme Court considered whether doctors have standing to challenge a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at local hospitals.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Russo v. June Medical Services (No. 18-1323; 18-1460) is a Healthcare & Conscience case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2020. The court held that the Supreme Court considered whether doctors have standing to challenge a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at local hospitals. The case resulted in a Pending outcome.