Stone v. Graham

Religious displays, including the Ten Commandments, cannot be mandated in public classrooms.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
2 min read
Cite This Case
Stone v. Graham, No. 1980 (U.S. 1980).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Stone v. Graham, No. 1980 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1980). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/stone-v-graham/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Stone v. Graham (No. 1980) [U.S. Supreme Court, 1980] — Religious displays, including the Ten Commandments, cannot be mandated in public classrooms. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/stone-v-graham/, accessed June 12, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 1980 Year: 1980 Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Holding: Religious displays, including the Ten Commandments, cannot be mandated in public classrooms.

Background

Kentucky enacted a statute requiring public schools to post copies of the Ten Commandments in every classroom, funded by private donations. The law mandated that each display include a notation stating the Ten Commandments were the "fundamental legal code of Western Civilization and the Common Law of the United States." Several Kentucky citizens challenged this requirement as a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

Legal Question

Does a Kentucky statute requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even when the displays are privately funded and include secular historical context?

Holding

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in a per curiam decision that Kentucky's mandatory Ten Commandments displays violated the Establishment Clause. The Court applied the Lemon test and found that the statute lacked a secular legislative purpose. Despite the state's argument that the displays served educational purposes about Western legal heritage, the Court determined that the Ten Commandments are inherently religious and their prominent posting in classrooms would have the primary effect of advancing religion. The private funding and historical notation could not cure the constitutional violation.

Significance

Stone v. Graham established important precedent limiting religious displays in public schools, even when privately funded. The decision reinforced that the Establishment Clause prohibits government endorsement of religion regardless of the funding source. This ruling has been cited extensively in subsequent cases involving religious monuments and displays on public property, helping define the boundaries between permissible acknowledgment of religion's historical role and impermissible government endorsement. The case remains highly relevant today as legislatures continue proposing similar Ten Commandments display requirements, with Louisiana's 2024 law directly challenging Stone's precedent.

Key Statutes & Provisions

  • First Amendment Establishment Clause ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion")
  • Fourteenth Amendment (applying First Amendment restrictions to state governments)
  • Lemon test (secular purpose, primary effect, excessive entanglement analysis)
  • Kentucky Revised Statutes requiring Ten Commandments classroom displays

Official Documents

Stone v. Graham (1980) is a Education case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1980. The court held that religious displays, including the Ten Commandments, cannot be mandated in public classrooms.

## Background
Kentucky enacted a statute requiring public schools to post copies of the Ten Commandments in every classroom, funded by private donations. The law mandated that each display include a notation stating the Ten Commandments were the “fundamental legal code of Western Civilization and the Common Law of the United States.” Several Kentucky citizens challenged this requirement as a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

## Legal Question
Does a Kentucky statute requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even when the displays are privately funded and include secular historical context?

## Holding
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in a per curiam decision that Kentucky’s mandatory Ten Commandments displays violated the Establishment Clause. The Court applied the Lemon test and found that the statute lacked a secular legislative purpose. Despite the state’s argument that the displays served educational purposes about Western legal heritage, the Court determined that the Ten Commandments are inherently religious and their prominent posting in classrooms would have the primary effect of advancing religion. The private funding and historical notation could not cure the constitutional violation.

## Significance
Stone v. Graham established important precedent limiting religious displays in public schools, even when privately funded. The decision reinforced that the Establishment Clause prohibits government endorsement of religion regardless of the funding source. This ruling has been cited extensively in subsequent cases involving religious monuments and displays on public property, helping define the boundaries between permissible acknowledgment of religion’s historical role and impermissible government endorsement. The case remains highly relevant today as legislatures continue proposing similar Ten Commandments display requirements, with Louisiana’s 2024 law directly challenging Stone’s precedent.

## Key Statutes & Provisions
– First Amendment Establishment Clause (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”)
– Fourteenth Amendment (applying First Amendment restrictions to state governments)
– Lemon test (secular purpose, primary effect, excessive entanglement analysis)
– Kentucky Revised Statutes requiring Ten Commandments classroom displays