July 8, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

City of Boerne v. Flores

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to state and local governments unless explicitly enacted by state legislatures.

Cite This Case
City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1997). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/city-of-boerne/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
City of Boerne v. Flores (521 U.S. 507) [U.S. Supreme Court, 1997] — The Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to state and local governments unless explicitly enacted by state legislatures. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/city-of-boerne/, accessed July 8, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 521 U.S. 507 Year: 1997 Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Holding: The Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to state and local governments unless explicitly enacted by state legislatures.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

City of Boerne v. Flores (521 U.S. 507) is a Church & State case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1997. The court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to state and local governments unless explicitly enacted by state legislatures.