July 3, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Hands On Originals

An LGBTQ+ advocacy organization lacked standing to bring a discrimination claim under a city non-discrimination ordinance that required an individual, not an organization, to assert the claim.

Cite This Case
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Hands On Originals, No. 2017-SC-000278-DG (2019).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Hands On Originals, No. 2017-SC-000278-DG (State Appellate Court, 2019). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/hands-on-originals-2/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Hands On Originals (No. 2017-SC-000278-DG) [State Appellate Court, 2019] — An LGBTQ+ advocacy organization lacked standing to bring a discrimination claim under a city non-discrimination ordinance that required an individual, not an organization, to assert the claim. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/hands-on-originals-2/, accessed July 4, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 2017-SC-000278-DG Year: 2019 Court: State Appellate Court
Holding: An LGBTQ+ advocacy organization lacked standing to bring a discrimination claim under a city non-discrimination ordinance that required an individual, not an organization, to assert the claim.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinions.kycourts.net PDF

Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Hands On Originals (2017-SC-000278-DG) is a Free Exercise case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2019. The court held that an LGBTQ+ advocacy organization lacked standing to bring a discrimination claim under a city non-discrimination ordinance that required an individual, not an organization, to assert the claim.