Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. — ReligiousLiberty.TV

Q: What court decided Gate Gourmet?

Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. was decided by the State Appellate Court in 2013.

Q: Who won Gate Gourmet?

The outcome in Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. was: Pending. The case raises the issue of whether a failure to make reasonable accommodation for an employee's sincere religious beliefs is implied in the Washington Law Against Discrimination.

Q: What legal issues are involved in Gate Gourmet?

Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. involves the following religious liberty issues: Free Exercise, Workplace Accommodation.

Cite This Case

Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. (2013).

✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. (State Appellate Court, 2013). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/kumar-v-gate-gourmet/

✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. [State Appellate Court, 2013] — The case raises the issue of whether a failure to make reasonable accommodation for an employee's sincere religious beliefs is implied in the Washington Law Against Discrimination. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/kumar-v-gate-gourmet/, accessed April 14, 2026).

✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Year: 2013 Court: State Appellate Court Outcome: Pending

Free Exercise Workplace Accommodation

Holding: The case raises the issue of whether a failure to make reasonable accommodation for an employee's sincere religious beliefs is implied in the Washington Law Against Discrimination.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📄 Read Opinion Article link

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 rosenberglawgroup.net PDF 📄 rosenberglawgroup.net PDF 📄 rosenberglawgroup.net PDF 📄 rosenberglawgroup.net PDF

Washington Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Whether State Law Requires Religious Accommodation October 30, 2013

Primary coverage 📎 rosenberglawgroup.net PDF 📎 rosenberglawgroup.net PDF 📎 rosenberglawgroup.net PDF 📎 rosenberglawgroup.net PDF

Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. is a Free Exercise case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2013. The court held that the case raises the issue of whether a failure to make reasonable accommodation for an employee's sincere religious beliefs is implied in the Washington Law Against Discrimination. The case resulted in a Pending outcome.