July 5, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck

The First Amendment constrains state action, not private conduct, and churches and priests are not state actors.

Cite This Case
Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 1921 (2019).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 1921 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2019). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/manhattan-cmty-access-corp-v-halleck/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck (139 S. Ct. 1921) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2019] — The First Amendment constrains state action, not private conduct, and churches and priests are not state actors. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/manhattan-cmty-access-corp-v-halleck/, accessed July 5, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 139 S. Ct. 1921 Year: 2019 Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Holding: The First Amendment constrains state action, not private conduct, and churches and priests are not state actors.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck (139 S. Ct. 1921) is a Establishment Clause case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2019. The court held that the First Amendment constrains state action, not private conduct, and churches and priests are not state actors.