July 5, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman

A Washington state pharmacy rule requiring all pharmacies to fill contraceptives regardless of religious objections of owners does not violate the Free Exercise Clause.

Cite This Case
Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman, No. 794 F.3d (2016).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman, No. 794 F.3d (2016). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/stormans/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman (No. 794 F.3d) [2016] — A Washington state pharmacy rule requiring all pharmacies to fill contraceptives regardless of religious objections of owners does not violate the Free Exercise Clause. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/stormans/, accessed July 5, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 794 F.3d Year: 2016
Holding: A Washington state pharmacy rule requiring all pharmacies to fill contraceptives regardless of religious objections of owners does not violate the Free Exercise Clause.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman (794 F.3d) is a Free Exercise case in 2016. The court held that a Washington state pharmacy rule requiring all pharmacies to fill contraceptives regardless of religious objections of owners does not violate the Free Exercise Clause.