RFRA

Supreme Court not likely to make individual FBI agents pay for allegedly violating Religious Freedom Restoration Act

By |

On October 6, 2020, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case on the issue of whether individual FBI agents can be held financially liable if they are found to have violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.  The underlying case involves Muslim-Americans who alleged that individual FBI agents put them on the “no fly” list after they refused to act as informants against fellow Muslims in terrorism-related investigations.

Supreme Court not likely to make individual FBI agents pay for allegedly violating Religious Freedom Restoration Act Read More »

Ryan Snow: Religious Freedom What's All the Freedom About - Book cover

Ryan Snow’s new book explores how Congress passed the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act and why it matters

By |

Attorney Ryan Snow has released a new book that is designed to bring non-lawyers up to date on the most important religious liberty debate facing America. Religious Freedom: What’s All the Freedom About recounts the history behind religious freedom laws, and includes an history of how Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA, in 1993 – a feat hardly imaginable today.  

Ryan Snow’s new book explores how Congress passed the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act and why it matters Read More »

U.S. Civil Rights Commission report gives free exercise of religion second-tier status

By |

In a stunning report, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Chairman Martin Castro attacked the Religious Freedom Restoration Act at both the state and federal level, challenged the terms “religious liberty” and “religious liberty” as code for intolerance, and argued that free exercise rights should yield to other civil rights if they come into conflict.

U.S. Civil Rights Commission report gives free exercise of religion second-tier status Read More »

Supreme Court hears oral arguments in key contraception mandate case

By |

This morning the eight-member United States Supreme Court heard the contraceptive mandate cases that were consolidated under the name Zubik v. Burwell (Docket Number 15-191). (See transcript.) They key issue in all the cases was religious employers who rejected the method of receiving the “religious employer exemption” to the Affordable Care Act (2010) which required group health plans and insurance issues to offer plans that provided “approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity.”

Supreme Court hears oral arguments in key contraception mandate case Read More »

Scroll to Top