Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

New Law – California will not participate in any federal religious registry

Posted on October 17, 2017October 17, 2017 by ReligiousLiberty.TV

 

On October 15, 2017, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a new law that will prevent state and local agencies and employees from disclosing information about a person’s religious beliefs to the federal government for use in creating a database for law enforcement or religious purposes.

While the “California Religious Freedom Act” (SB 31) (text here) does not identify any particular religion, bill author state Senator Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens) intended the bill to combat Islamophobia at the federal level. According to the Los Angeles Times, Sen. Lara cited statements made by presidential candidate Trump that there “should be a lot of systems” to track Muslims in the United States.Trump supporters had referred to Japanese Internment camps during World War II as providing legal precedent for a registry of Muslims. Upon taking office, Trump implemented a ban on travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries.

SB 31 passed with extensive bipartisan support, by a margin of 76 to 2 in the Assembly and 36 to 0 in the Senate. The bill will prevent the state from participating in any federal registries involving any religious group based on affiliation or practices. However, the bill will not prevent state or local agencies from disclosing information to provide religious accommodations or during “a targeted investigation of an individual based on reasonable suspicion that he or she has engaged in criminal activity.”

  • religious discrimination
  • Donald Trump
  • Japanese Internment
  • Muslim ban
  • religious database
  • 1 thought on “New Law – California will not participate in any federal religious registry”

    1. Marylin George says:
      October 17, 2017 at 1:55 pm

      Does this mean that other states will be enacting such a registry?

    Comments are closed.

    Tweets by RelLibertyTV

    Recent Posts

    • Pork Farm Supreme Court Decision May Allow State Legislatures to Regulate Moral Behavior In Other States

      Pork Farm Supreme Court Decision May Allow State Legislatures to Regulate Moral Behavior In Other States

      May 17, 2023
    • Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Accommodating Religious Practices in the Workplace: Groff v. DeJoy Case Update

      Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Accommodating Religious Practices in the Workplace: Groff v. DeJoy Case Update

      April 21, 2023
    • Learn About US Government and Liberty of Conscience in the Nation's Capitol: New Course for Adventist High School Students Gives College Credit

      Learn About US Government and Liberty of Conscience in the Nation's Capitol: New Course for Adventist High School Students Gives College Credit

      March 28, 2023
    • Founders’ First Freedom files Amicus Brief in US Supreme Court in Support of Workplace Religious Freedom

      Founders’ First Freedom files Amicus Brief in US Supreme Court in Support of Workplace Religious Freedom

      March 26, 2023
    • U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

      U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

      February 5, 2023

    We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

    ©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}