July 12, 2026

ReligiousLiberty.TV

The most comprehensive online resource for tracking connections and patterns in U.S. religious liberty case law — covering First Amendment, RFRA, and conscience rights since 2008.

Hodges v. Gloria

Government officials may dismiss or refuse to appoint volunteers for statements that would normally receive First Amendment protection if a commonality of political purpose is required for the role.

Cite This Case
Hodges v. Gloria, No. 24-7093 (2026).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Hodges v. Gloria, No. 24-7093 (2026). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/hodges/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Hodges v. Gloria (No. 24-7093) [2026] — Government officials may dismiss or refuse to appoint volunteers for statements that would normally receive First Amendment protection if a commonality of political purpose is required for the role. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/hodges/, accessed July 12, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: No. 24-7093 Year: 2026
Holding: Government officials may dismiss or refuse to appoint volunteers for statements that would normally receive First Amendment protection if a commonality of political purpose is required for the role.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 9th Circuit PDF

Hodges v. Gloria (No. 24-7093) is a Free Exercise case in 2026. The court held that government officials may dismiss or refuse to appoint volunteers for statements that would normally receive First Amendment protection if a commonality of political purpose is required for the role.