Newdow v. United States Congress

Q: What court decided United States Congress?

Newdow v. United States Congress was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2004.

Q: Who won United States Congress?

The outcome in Newdow v. United States Congress was: Dismissed. The Court dismissed the case on a technicality regarding standing rather than deciding the merits of the Pledge of Allegiance challenge.

Q: What legal issues are involved in United States Congress?

Newdow v. United States Congress involves the following religious liberty issues: Establishment Clause, Public Display.

The Court dismissed the case on a technicality regarding standing rather than deciding the merits of the Pledge of Allegiance challenge.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

March 3, 2026

0 min read

Year: 2004 Court: U.S. Supreme Court Outcome: Dismissed

Establishment Clause Public Display

Holding: The Court dismissed the case on a technicality regarding standing rather than deciding the merits of the Pledge of Allegiance challenge.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📚 CourtListener

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

VIDEO: Michael Newdow in Panel at Boston College on Religious Freedom and the Pledge of Allegiance June 28, 2008

Primary coverage
Lawsuit filed to remove "So help me God" from inaugural oath (USA Today) January 7, 2009

Primary coverage

Newdow v. United States Congress is a Establishment Clause case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2004. The court held that the Court dismissed the case on a technicality regarding standing rather than deciding the merits of the Pledge of Allegiance challenge. The case resulted in a Dismissed outcome.

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
5
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
Roake v. BrumleyNo. 24-30 (2026)
2
Anti-Religion
A preliminary injunction blocking Louisiana's Ten Commandments display law is vacated because plaintiffs' legal challenge is not yet…
📄 Opinion available
3
Gilfillan v. City of Philadelphia637 F.2d 924 (1980)
2
Philadelphia violated the Establishment Clause by spending taxpayer funds to build a platform for a papal mass and…
📄 Opinion available
4
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.573 U.S. 682 (2014)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Religious liberty protections under RFRA apply to closely held for-profit corporations.
📄 Opinion available
5
Hubersberger v. State2 CA-CV 2025-0188 (2026)
1
Religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers…
📄 Opinion available
6
Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District(2026)
1
Pending
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is reconsidering whether Texas can mandate Ten Commandments displays in public…
7
Kimberly Ann Polk v. Montgomery County Board of Education
1
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a substitute teacher's lawsuit challenging a school district…
8
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
1
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
9
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. DoeNo. 24-856 (2026)
1
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
The Court must determine if U.S. corporations can be sued under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim…
📄 Opinion available
10
Satanic Temple, Inc. v. RokitaNo. 23-3247 (2026)
1
The Satanic Temple lacks associational standing to challenge Indiana's abortion ban because it failed to identify specific injured…
📄 Opinion available