National Religious Broadcasters v. Long

Communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through usual channels on matters of faith do not violate the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
National Religious Broadcasters v. Long (D. 2025).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

National Religious Broadcasters v. Long (U.S. District Court, 2025). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/national-religious-broadcasters-v-long/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

National Religious Broadcasters v. Long [U.S. District Court, 2025] — Communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through usual channels on matters of faith do not violate the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/national-religious-broadcasters-v-long/, accessed April 12, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Year: 2025 Court: U.S. District Court Outcome: Settled
Holding: Communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through usual channels on matters of faith do not violate the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

National Religious Broadcasters v. Long is a Church & State case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2025. The court held that communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through usual channels on matters of faith do not violate the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted. The case resulted in a Settled outcome.