Cite This Case
New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).
✓ Copied!
Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1964). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/new-york-times-v-sullivan/
✓ Copied!
For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
New York Times v. Sullivan (376 U.S. 254) [U.S. Supreme Court, 1964] — The Supreme Court held that libelous words about a public official can be protected when made in the context of fostering debate about government and public affairs. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/new-york-times-v-sullivan/, accessed April 9, 2026).
✓ Copied!
For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Holding: The Supreme Court held that libelous words about a public official can be protected when made in the context of fostering debate about government and public affairs.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Official Documents
Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV
📎 Document links found in our articles:
📄 opinion
-
Alex Jones, PayPal, and Freedom of Speech - An Explainer October 14, 2022
New York Times v. Sullivan (376 U.S. 254) is a Free Speech & Religion case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1964. The court held that the Supreme Court held that libelous words about a public official can be protected when made in the context of fostering debate about government and public affairs.