New York Times v. Sullivan

The Supreme Court held that libelous words about a public official can be protected when made in the context of fostering debate about government and public affairs.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Citation: 376 U.S. 254 Year: 1964 Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Holding: The Supreme Court held that libelous words about a public official can be protected when made in the context of fostering debate about government and public affairs.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

New York Times v. Sullivan (376 U.S. 254) is a Free Speech & Religion case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1964. The court held that the Supreme Court held that libelous words about a public official can be protected when made in the context of fostering debate about government and public affairs.