National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra

A California law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide abortion information likely violated the First Amendment as an unconstitutional compelled speech requirement.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 138 S. Ct. 2361 (2018).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 138 S. Ct. 2361 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2018). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/nifla-v-becerra/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (138 S. Ct. 2361) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2018] — A California law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide abortion information likely violated the First Amendment as an unconstitutional compelled speech requirement. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/nifla-v-becerra/, accessed April 9, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 138 S. Ct. 2361 Year: 2018 Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Holding: A California law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide abortion information likely violated the First Amendment as an unconstitutional compelled speech requirement.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (138 S. Ct. 2361) is a Free Speech & Religion case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018. The court held that a California law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide abortion information likely violated the First Amendment as an unconstitutional compelled speech requirement.