Schroeder v. Treto

Section 6.1(1) of Illinois’ Health Care Right of Conscience Act violates the First Amendment by compelling anti-abortion health care providers to discuss abortion’s benefits as a condition for retaining civil immunity.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
Schroeder v. Treto (D. 2025).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Schroeder v. Treto (U.S. District Court, 2025). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/schroeder/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Schroeder v. Treto [U.S. District Court, 2025] — Section 6.1(1) of Illinois' Health Care Right of Conscience Act violates the First Amendment by compelling anti-abortion health care providers to discuss abortion's benefits as a condition for retaining civil immunity. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/schroeder/, accessed April 12, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Year: 2025 Court: U.S. District Court
Holding: Section 6.1(1) of Illinois' Health Care Right of Conscience Act violates the First Amendment by compelling anti-abortion health care providers to discuss abortion's benefits as a condition for retaining civil immunity.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Schroeder v. Treto is a Free Speech & Religion case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2025. The court held that section 6.1(1) of Illinois' Health Care Right of Conscience Act violates the First Amendment by compelling anti-abortion health care providers to discuss abortion's benefits as a condition for retaining civil immunity.