United States Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International Inc.

Foreign affiliates of U.S. organizations possess no First Amendment rights and may be required to adopt an anti-prostitution policy as a condition of receiving federal AIDS funding.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
United States Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International Inc., No. 19-177 (U.S. 2020).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
United States Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International Inc., No. 19-177 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2020). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/usaid-v-alliance-for-open-society-international/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
United States Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International Inc. (No. 19-177) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2020] — Foreign affiliates of U.S. organizations possess no First Amendment rights and may be required to adopt an anti-prostitution policy as a condition of receiving federal AIDS funding. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/usaid-v-alliance-for-open-society-international/, accessed April 9, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 19-177 Year: 2020 Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Holding: Foreign affiliates of U.S. organizations possess no First Amendment rights and may be required to adopt an anti-prostitution policy as a condition of receiving federal AIDS funding.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

United States Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International Inc. (19-177) is a Free Speech & Religion case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2020. The court held that foreign affiliates of U.S. organizations possess no First Amendment rights and may be required to adopt an anti-prostitution policy as a condition of receiving federal AIDS funding.