West Virginia v. B.P.J.

Q: What court decided B.P.J.?

West Virginia v. B.P.J. was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2026.

Q: What is the citation for B.P.J.?

The official citation for West Virginia v. B.P.J. is No. 24-43.

Q: Who won B.P.J.?

The outcome in West Virginia v. B.P.J. was: Pending. The Court must decide if a state law preventing transgender girls from joining female sports teams violates Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause based on the definition of sex in the statute.

Q: What legal issues are involved in B.P.J.?

West Virginia v. B.P.J. involves the following religious liberty issues: Education, LGBTQ & Religious Liberty.

The Court must decide if a state law preventing transgender girls from joining female sports teams violates Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause based on the definition of sex in the statute.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026

0 min read

Citation: No. 24-43 Year: 2026 Court: U.S. Supreme Court Outcome: Pending

Education LGBTQ & Religious Liberty

Holding: The Court must decide if a state law preventing transgender girls from joining female sports teams violates Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause based on the definition of sex in the statute.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

No official documents found yet.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Supreme Court Reviews West Virginia Law Banning Transgender Athletes from Girls' Sports January 16, 2026

Primary coverage

West Virginia v. B.P.J. (No. 24-43) is a Education case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2026. The court held that the Court must decide if a state law preventing transgender girls from joining female sports teams violates Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause based on the definition of sex in the statute. The case resulted in a Pending outcome.

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump607 U.S. ____ (2026) (2026)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
The President cannot use emergency statutes to bypass Congress for actions of vast economic or political significance without…
3
Doe XXV v. Archdiocese of New York, Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, and Our Lady of Mount Carmel School2026 NY Slip Op 30269(U) (2026)
3
State Appellate Court
Neutral principles of negligent hiring and supervision apply to religious institutions; First Amendment does not shield religious organizations…
4
New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.25-40102-FDS (2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pro-Religion
A DHS policy permitting warrantless immigration enforcement at churches violates RFRA by substantially burdening religious exercise without using…
📄 Opinion available
5
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
6
Groff v. DeJoy600 U.S. 447 (2023)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Employers cannot deny religious accommodation to workers unless it causes substantial increased costs or burdens on business operations.
📄 Opinion available
7
Bill 21 (Supreme Court of Canada Appeal)(2026)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
8
Troogstad v. City of Chicago25-1575 (2025)
2
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate how a COVID-19 vaccine mandate burdened their specific religious practices under the Free Exercise…
📄 Opinion available
9
Wailes v. Jefferson County Public Schools(2025)
2
Remanded
District court dismissal of parents' challenge to school's policy of assigning students to overnight accommodations based on gender…
📄 Opinion available
10
Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. Nick Brown24-7246 (2026)
2
The First Amendment's church autonomy doctrine extends beyond the ministerial exception to protect a religious organization's decision to…
📄 Opinion available