Woart v. Winnick

New Hampshire courts established that expiration of a statute of limitations creates a constitutionally protected defense.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
Woart v. Winnick, 3 N.H. 473 (1826).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Woart v. Winnick, 3 N.H. 473 (State Appellate Court, 1826). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/woart/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Woart v. Winnick (3 N.H. 473) [State Appellate Court, 1826] — New Hampshire courts established that expiration of a statute of limitations creates a constitutionally protected defense. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/woart/, accessed April 11, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Official citation: 3 N.H. 473 (1826)  ·  State Appellate Court  ·  1826
⚠ AI-assisted. These citations are generated from structured case data and should be verified against an official legal database (Westlaw, LexisNexis, or the original court record) before use in legal filings, academic papers, or publication.
Citation: 3 N.H. 473 Year: 1826 Court: State Appellate Court
Holding: New Hampshire courts established that expiration of a statute of limitations creates a constitutionally protected defense.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📚 CourtListener

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Woart v. Winnick (3 N.H. 473) is a case decided by the State Appellate Court in 1826. The court held that new Hampshire courts established that expiration of a statute of limitations creates a constitutionally protected defense.

Share this article: LinkedIn X / Twitter Facebook ✉️ Email