Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

Down the Rabbit Hole: What’s Really at Stake With Domestic Surveillance? (Huffington Post)

Posted on June 21, 2013June 21, 2013 by Ryan Bell

neo-looking

Ryan J. Bell writes the following for the Huffington Post, excerpted briefly below. Click here to read the full article.

EXCERPT:

[box]We know that PRISM is not a surveillance program but a massive computer system used to crunch data. But the claim that anyone who refers to PRISM as a data-mining program should not be trusted cuts off the conversation. Whether PRISM is a secret or a data mining program or not, it still represents the NSA’s collection and processing of the data communications of millions and millions of Americans without probable cause.

It may be that Snowden exaggerated his claim that he could hack the president’s email if he had the address and that NSA personnel can listen to anyone’s phone calls. Maybe. But why should I take General Keith Alexander at his word any more than I take Edward Snowden at his? Because the general has a uniform? The argument that the NSA isn’t doing something illegal because there’s a law against it (namely, listening in on our calls and reading our email) seems to me like saying that there’s no way my daughter ate the cookie I left on the kitchen counter because we have a rule in our house that she may not eat between meals. I’m not buying it! Why chase Snowden to the ends of the earth and threaten him with charges of espionage and treason if his claims boil down to no big deal and things we’ve known about all along anyway?

And what is the big deal? If we have nothing to hide, we shouldn’t be so worried that the NSA is listening in to our calls to family and friends. But don’t forget that in 2006 the American Friends Service Committee, a Quaker peace organization, sued the Pentagon “in the wake of evidence that [the Pentagon] had been secretly conducting illegal surveillance of protest activities, antiwar organizations, and individuals whose only reported ‘wrong-doing’ was attending a peace rally.”[/box]

Click here to read the full article.

 

1 thought on “Down the Rabbit Hole: What’s Really at Stake With Domestic Surveillance? (Huffington Post)”

  1. RelLibertyTV says:
    June 21, 2013 at 8:54 am

    Down the Rabbit Hole: What’s Really at Stake With Domestic Surveillance? (Huffington Post) http://t.co/oJ3lTEhSj1

Comments are closed.

Tweets by RelLibertyTV

Recent Posts

  • Pepperdine Caruso School of Law receives gift from Founders’ First Freedom for Law and Religion Fellows Program and Conference

    Pepperdine Caruso School of Law receives gift from Founders’ First Freedom for Law and Religion Fellows Program and Conference

    August 25, 2023
  • The Popularity and Pitfalls of Christian Nationalism

    The Popularity and Pitfalls of Christian Nationalism

    August 21, 2023
  • Stephen Allred addresses Christian Nationalism in new Review article

    Stephen Allred addresses Christian Nationalism in new Review article

    August 7, 2023
  • High School Students Take on Capitol Hill in Summer Intensive Sponsored by Founders' First Freedom

    High School Students Take on Capitol Hill in Summer Intensive Sponsored by Founders' First Freedom

    July 28, 2023
  • Supreme Court Rules First Amendment Protects Wedding Website Designer's Freedom of Speech

    Supreme Court Rules First Amendment Protects Wedding Website Designer's Freedom of Speech

    June 30, 2023

We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}