9th Circuit Upholds $7.8 Million BART Verdict as Vaccine Battles Redefine “Religious Liberty”
A federal appeals court upheld a 7.8 million dollar jury verdict for six transit workers fired by the…
Research desk
Cases, courts, clauses, statutes, and coverage in one searchable publication archive.
Current events
A federal appeals court upheld a 7.8 million dollar jury verdict for six transit workers fired by the…
Federal appellate jurisprudence often demands a strong stomach, yet rarely has a single court exhibited such breathtaking intellectual…
Photo: iStockPhoto.com Nearly everyone in the Lindsay Clancy case has an advocate. Clancy has defense lawyers arguing that…
Rulings · filings · arguments
A fast read on the legal and public-policy developments worth putting on your calendar.
Open case libraryReporting and analysis
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel invoked the biblical heroine to urge Jewish Democrats to be willing to sacrifice their own security and future.
How Rome, Paul, and History Remembered a Forgotten Pioneer
When the state decides to medicalize suicide, it rarely stops at permitting the act.
A look at why civil legal advocacy remains an essential shield for the church in an imperfect world.
By Michael Peabody -
By lowering the legal bar to a simple "best interest" standard, Maine courts have created an urgent federal question for the U.S. Supreme Court.