Cite This Case
State v. Anti-Abortion Protesters (2024).
✓ Copied!
Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
State v. Anti-Abortion Protesters (2024). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/anti-abortion-protesters-case/
✓ Copied!
For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
State v. Anti-Abortion Protesters [2024] — Passive resistance by anti-abortion protesters at a clinic qualifies as obstruction under Michigan law, and religious beliefs do not exempt individuals from complying with lawful orders. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/anti-abortion-protesters-case/, accessed April 10, 2026).
✓ Copied!
For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.
Holding: Passive resistance by anti-abortion protesters at a clinic qualifies as obstruction under Michigan law, and religious beliefs do not exempt individuals from complying with lawful orders.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Official Documents
State v. Anti-Abortion Protesters is a Free Exercise case in 2024. The court held that passive resistance by anti-abortion protesters at a clinic qualifies as obstruction under Michigan law, and religious beliefs do not exempt individuals from complying with lawful orders.