Vanessa Willock v. Elane Photography

The New Mexico Human Rights Commission ruled that the photographer engaged in illegal discrimination based on sexual orientation in violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
Vanessa Willock v. Elane Photography (2008).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Vanessa Willock v. Elane Photography (State Appellate Court, 2008). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/elane-photography-2/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Vanessa Willock v. Elane Photography [State Appellate Court, 2008] — The New Mexico Human Rights Commission ruled that the photographer engaged in illegal discrimination based on sexual orientation in violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/elane-photography-2/, accessed April 9, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Year: 2008 Court: State Appellate Court
Holding: The New Mexico Human Rights Commission ruled that the photographer engaged in illegal discrimination based on sexual orientation in violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Vanessa Willock v. Elane Photography is a Free Exercise case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2008. The court held that the New Mexico Human Rights Commission ruled that the photographer engaged in illegal discrimination based on sexual orientation in violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act.