Cite This Case
Hubersberger v. State, No. 2 CA-CV 2025-0188 (2026).
✓ Copied!
Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Hubersberger v. State, No. 2 CA-CV 2025-0188 (2026). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/hubersberger-v-state/
✓ Copied!
For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Hubersberger v. State (No. 2 CA-CV 2025-0188) [2026] — Religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers even when conduct is religiously motivated when it serves compelling governmental interests. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/hubersberger-v-state/, accessed April 9, 2026).
✓ Copied!
For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Holding: Religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers even when conduct is religiously motivated when it serves compelling governmental interests.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Official Documents
Hubersberger v. State (2 CA-CV 2025-0188) is a Free Exercise case in 2026. The court held that religious motivation does not provide immunity from neutral criminal laws protecting private property; the state may prosecute trespassers even when conduct is religiously motivated when it serves compelling governmental interests.