Middleton v. Pan

A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California’s mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
Middleton v. Pan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) (D. 2018).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Middleton v. Pan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) (U.S. District Court, 2018). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/middleton-v-pan/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Middleton v. Pan (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018)) [U.S. District Court, 2018] — A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/middleton-v-pan/, accessed April 9, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018) Year: 2018 Court: U.S. District Court
Holding: A pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Middleton v. Pan (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13254 (CD CA, Jan. 25, 2018)) is a Education case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2018. The court held that a pro se RICO lawsuit challenging California's mandatory vaccination law removing religious exemptions was dismissed with prejudice.