Elizabeth Mirabelli, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al.

California’s policies preventing public schools from disclosing a student’s gender transition to parents without the student’s consent likely violate both the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
March 24, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
Elizabeth Mirabelli, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al., No. 25A810, 607 U.S. ____ (2026) (U.S. 2026).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Elizabeth Mirabelli, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al., No. 25A810, 607 U.S. ____ (2026) (U.S. Supreme Court, 2026). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/mirabelli-v-bonta/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Elizabeth Mirabelli, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al. (No. 25A810, 607 U.S. ____ (2026)) [U.S. Supreme Court, 2026] — California's policies preventing public schools from disclosing a student's gender transition to parents without the student's consent likely violate both the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/mirabelli-v-bonta/, accessed March 25, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: No. 25A810, 607 U.S. ____ (2026) Year: 2026 Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Holding: California's policies preventing public schools from disclosing a student's gender transition to parents without the student's consent likely violate both the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Elizabeth Mirabelli, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al. (No. 25A810, 607 U.S. ____ (2026)) is a Education case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2026. The court held that california's policies preventing public schools from disclosing a student's gender transition to parents without the student's consent likely violate both the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.