New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

A DHS policy permitting warrantless immigration enforcement at churches violates RFRA by substantially burdening religious exercise without using the least restrictive means of enforcement.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al., No. 25-40102-FDS (D. 2026).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al., No. 25-40102-FDS (U.S. District Court, 2026). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/new-england-synod-v-dhs/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al. (No. 25-40102-FDS) [U.S. District Court, 2026] — A DHS policy permitting warrantless immigration enforcement at churches violates RFRA by substantially burdening religious exercise without using the least restrictive means of enforcement. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/new-england-synod-v-dhs/, accessed April 8, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 25-40102-FDS Year: 2026 Court: U.S. District Court Outcome: Pro-Religion
Holding: A DHS policy permitting warrantless immigration enforcement at churches violates RFRA by substantially burdening religious exercise without using the least restrictive means of enforcement.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 democracyforward.org PDF

New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al. (25-40102-FDS) is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2026. The court held that a DHS policy permitting warrantless immigration enforcement at churches violates RFRA by substantially burdening religious exercise without using the least restrictive means of enforcement. The case resulted in a Pro-Religion outcome.