Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman

A Washington state pharmacy rule requiring all pharmacies to fill contraceptives regardless of religious objections of owners does not violate the Free Exercise Clause.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman, No. 794 F.3d (2016).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman, No. 794 F.3d (2016). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/stormans/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman (No. 794 F.3d) [2016] — A Washington state pharmacy rule requiring all pharmacies to fill contraceptives regardless of religious objections of owners does not violate the Free Exercise Clause. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/stormans/, accessed April 10, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: 794 F.3d Year: 2016
Holding: A Washington state pharmacy rule requiring all pharmacies to fill contraceptives regardless of religious objections of owners does not violate the Free Exercise Clause.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Stormans Inc. v. Wiesman (794 F.3d) is a Free Exercise case in 2016. The court held that a Washington state pharmacy rule requiring all pharmacies to fill contraceptives regardless of religious objections of owners does not violate the Free Exercise Clause.