Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

Oregon Bakers’ $135,000 Fine Held in Escrow Pending Appeal

Posted on December 29, 2015December 29, 2015 by ReligiousLiberty.TV ReligiousLiberty.TV
white wedding cake with blue flowers on a table with a black background
Deposit Photos / mantonino 

On Monday, Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of the Sweet Cakes by Melissa bakery paid a $135,000 fine levied against them by the state of Oregon for refusing on religious grounds to provide a cake for a same-sex commitment ceremony two years ago.

On July 2, 2015, the Oregon labor commissioner had ordered the fine to pay for emotional and mental damages on the basis that the bakers had violated the lesbian couple’s rights by discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation when the Aaron Klein had declined to make a cake citing his religious beliefs against same-sex marriage.
Yesterday’s check was issued for $136,927.07, including accrued interest on the amount, and will be held in escrow while the Kleins appeal the decision. This is in addition to a $7,000 amount that the state’s labor bureau had recovered from a garnished bank account, according to the Oregonian.

The Oregonian further reports that the Kleins have raised over $515,000 to help with the cost of the fine as well as legal costs. The couple decided to go ahead and pay the fine at this point because the state was going to garnish the donated money to pay the fine making it impossible for the couple to earn interest on it. The legal fight will continue in the Oregon Court of Appeals next year and if the Kleins win, they will get their money back next year.
In the meantime, the bakery has closed and the couple is making cakes from their home.
To avoid confusion it should be noted that the Klein case arose prior to Supreme Court’s June 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges upholding same-sex marriage and that this case was predicated on sexual orientation discrimination and did not address the right to marry.

The debilitating amount of the fine imposed on the small Gresham business has sent shockwaves through the legal and business community and the case will be closely watched in 2016 and may well become a national focus in the already intense 2016 presidential race.

###

1 thought on “Oregon Bakers’ $135,000 Fine Held in Escrow Pending Appeal”

  1. Marylin George says:
    January 1, 2016 at 4:26 pm

    https://youtu.be/ZY_OcEUIBK0

Comments are closed.

Tweets by RelLibertyTV

Recent Posts

  • U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

    U.S. District Court Dismisses Hunter v. US Dept of Education Lawsuit

    February 5, 2023
  • Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

    Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

    January 30, 2023
  • Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

    Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

    January 13, 2023
  • Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

    Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

    January 11, 2023
  • Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

    Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

    January 9, 2023

We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}