Skip to content
September 12, 2026
Independent reporting and primary-source research on religious liberty and the First Amendment since 2008.
ReligiousLiberty.TV Law · Liberty · Conscience
Subscribe
Legal Case Library
Legal Case

Central Okanagan School District No. 23 v. Renaud

Employers and unions must accommodate employees' religious beliefs unless doing so would cause undue hardship.
ReligiousLiberty.TV February 26, 2026 1 min read
Cite This Case
Central Okanagan School District No. 23 v. Renaud (1992).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Central Okanagan School District No. 23 v. Renaud (State Appellate Court, 1992). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/central-okanagan-renaud/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Central Okanagan School District No. 23 v. Renaud [State Appellate Court, 1992] — Employers and unions must accommodate employees' religious beliefs unless doing so would cause undue hardship. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/central-okanagan-renaud/, accessed September 12, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Year: 1992 Court: State Appellate Court
Holding: Employers and unions must accommodate employees' religious beliefs unless doing so would cause undue hardship.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Central Okanagan School District No. 23 v. Renaud is a Free Exercise case decided by the State Appellate Court in 1992. The court held that employers and unions must accommodate employees' religious beliefs unless doing so would cause undue hardship.

ReligiousLiberty.TV