Jeanpierre v. Trump

U.S. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg ruled that Executive Order 14253 did not substantially burden the plaintiff’s religious exercise because the order imposed no penalties, compelled no speech, and made no direct contact with the plaintiff.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Citation: 2:25-cv-00290 Year: 2025 Court: U.S. District Court
Free Exercise
Holding: U.S. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg ruled that Executive Order 14253 did not substantially burden the plaintiff's religious exercise because the order imposed no penalties, compelled no speech, and made no direct contact with the plaintiff.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📄 Read Opinion Article link

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 Justia PDF

Jeanpierre v. Trump (2:25-cv-00290) is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2025. The court held that u.S. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg ruled that Executive Order 14253 did not substantially burden the plaintiff's religious exercise because the order imposed no penalties, compelled no speech, and made no direct contact with the plaintiff.