State of Kansas v. U.S. Department of Education

The court found that the Department of Education’s Final Rule expanding Title IX to include gender identity and sexual orientation exceeded the DoE’s statutory authority and violated federalism principles under the Spending Clause.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
State of Kansas v. U.S. Department of Education, No. D KS, July 2, 2024 (D. 2024).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
State of Kansas v. U.S. Department of Education, No. D KS, July 2, 2024 (U.S. District Court, 2024). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/kansas-v-department-of-education/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
State of Kansas v. U.S. Department of Education (No. D KS, July 2, 2024) [U.S. District Court, 2024] — The court found that the Department of Education's Final Rule expanding Title IX to include gender identity and sexual orientation exceeded the DoE's statutory authority and violated federalism principles under the Spending Clause. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/kansas-v-department-of-education/, accessed April 11, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Citation: D KS, July 2, 2024 Year: 2024 Court: U.S. District Court
Holding: The court found that the Department of Education's Final Rule expanding Title IX to include gender identity and sexual orientation exceeded the DoE's statutory authority and violated federalism principles under the Spending Clause.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

State of Kansas v. U.S. Department of Education (D KS, July 2, 2024) is a Education case decided by the U.S. District Court in 2024. The court held that the court found that the Department of Education's Final Rule expanding Title IX to include gender identity and sexual orientation exceeded the DoE's statutory authority and violated federalism principles under the Spending Clause.