Kennedy v. Braidwood Management

Q: What court decided Braidwood Management?

Kennedy v. Braidwood Management was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2025.

Q: Who won Braidwood Management?

The outcome in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management was: Pending. The Supreme Court is considering whether religiously motivated employers can seek exemptions from ACA preventive care mandates for HIV prevention drugs.

Q: What legal issues are involved in Braidwood Management?

Kennedy v. Braidwood Management involves the following religious liberty issues: Free Exercise, Healthcare & Conscience, Workplace Accommodation.

The Supreme Court is considering whether religiously motivated employers can seek exemptions from ACA preventive care mandates for HIV prevention drugs.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026

0 min read

Year: 2025 Court: U.S. Supreme Court Outcome: Pending

Free Exercise Healthcare & Conscience Workplace Accommodation

Holding: The Supreme Court is considering whether religiously motivated employers can seek exemptions from ACA preventive care mandates for HIV prevention drugs.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

No official documents found yet.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Kennedy v. Braidwood Management: Faith-Based Challenge to HIV Prevention Coverage Reaches Supreme Court April 21, 2025

Primary coverage

Kennedy v. Braidwood Management is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2025. The court held that the Supreme Court is considering whether religiously motivated employers can seek exemptions from ACA preventive care mandates for HIV prevention drugs. The case resulted in a Pending outcome.

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
3
Groff v. DeJoy600 U.S. 447 (2023)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Employers cannot deny religious accommodation to workers unless it causes substantial increased costs or burdens on business operations.
📄 Opinion available
4
Bill 21 (Supreme Court of Canada Appeal)(2026)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
5
Troogstad v. City of Chicago25-1575 (2025)
2
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate how a COVID-19 vaccine mandate burdened their specific religious practices under the Free Exercise…
📄 Opinion available
6
Wailes v. Jefferson County Public Schools(2025)
2
Remanded
District court dismissal of parents' challenge to school's policy of assigning students to overnight accommodations based on gender…
📄 Opinion available
7
Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. Nick Brown24-7246 (2026)
2
The First Amendment's church autonomy doctrine extends beyond the ministerial exception to protect a religious organization's decision to…
📄 Opinion available
8
Gilfillan v. City of Philadelphia637 F.2d 924 (1980)
2
Philadelphia violated the Establishment Clause by spending taxpayer funds to build a platform for a papal mass and…
📄 Opinion available
9
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.573 U.S. 682 (2014)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Religious liberty protections under RFRA apply to closely held for-profit corporations.
📄 Opinion available
10
We the Patriots USA, Inc. v. State of Connecticut Department of EducationHHD-CV-22-6152413-S (2025)
2
State Appellate Court
The court dismissed state constitutional claims based on sovereign immunity but allowed a statutory religious liberty claim under…