Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania

Q: What court decided Pennsylvania?

Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2020.

Q: What is the citation for Pennsylvania?

The official citation for Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania is 19-431.

Q: What legal issues are involved in Pennsylvania?

Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania involves the following religious liberty issues: Free Exercise, Healthcare & Conscience.

Government agencies have the power to determine whether to apply ACA contraceptive mandates to employers, rather than courts directly addressing free exercise claims.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026

0 min read

Citation: 19-431 Year: 2020 Court: U.S. Supreme Court

Free Exercise Healthcare & Conscience

Holding: Government agencies have the power to determine whether to apply ACA contraceptive mandates to employers, rather than courts directly addressing free exercise claims.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📄 Read Opinion Article link

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 SupremeCourt.gov PDF

Court rules agency can decide if employers must provide contraceptive coverage July 10, 2020

Primary coverage 📎 SupremeCourt.gov PDF

Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania (19-431) is a Free Exercise case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2020. The court held that government agencies have the power to determine whether to apply ACA contraceptive mandates to employers, rather than courts directly addressing free exercise claims.

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump607 U.S. ____ (2026) (2026)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
The President cannot use emergency statutes to bypass Congress for actions of vast economic or political significance without…
3
Doe XXV v. Archdiocese of New York, Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, and Our Lady of Mount Carmel School2026 NY Slip Op 30269(U) (2026)
3
State Appellate Court
Neutral principles of negligent hiring and supervision apply to religious institutions; First Amendment does not shield religious organizations…
4
New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.25-40102-FDS (2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pro-Religion
A DHS policy permitting warrantless immigration enforcement at churches violates RFRA by substantially burdening religious exercise without using…
📄 Opinion available
5
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
6
Groff v. DeJoy600 U.S. 447 (2023)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Employers cannot deny religious accommodation to workers unless it causes substantial increased costs or burdens on business operations.
📄 Opinion available
7
Bill 21 (Supreme Court of Canada Appeal)(2026)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
8
Troogstad v. City of Chicago25-1575 (2025)
2
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate how a COVID-19 vaccine mandate burdened their specific religious practices under the Free Exercise…
📄 Opinion available
9
Wailes v. Jefferson County Public Schools(2025)
2
Remanded
District court dismissal of parents' challenge to school's policy of assigning students to overnight accommodations based on gender…
📄 Opinion available
10
Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. Nick Brown24-7246 (2026)
2
The First Amendment's church autonomy doctrine extends beyond the ministerial exception to protect a religious organization's decision to…
📄 Opinion available