Cite This Case
Minton v. Dignity Health, No. A153662 (2019).
✓ Copied!
Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).
Minton v. Dignity Health, No. A153662 (State Appellate Court, 2019). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/minton/
✓ Copied!
For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.
Minton v. Dignity Health (No. A153662) [State Appellate Court, 2019] — A religious hospital can be liable for discrimination under the Unruh Civil Rights Act if it refuses to provide medical services for religious reasons without immediately providing a referral to an accommodating hospital. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/minton/, accessed April 9, 2026).
✓ Copied!
For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.
Holding: A religious hospital can be liable for discrimination under the Unruh Civil Rights Act if it refuses to provide medical services for religious reasons without immediately providing a referral to an accommodating hospital.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.
Official Documents
Minton v. Dignity Health (A153662) is a Healthcare & Conscience case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2019. The court held that a religious hospital can be liable for discrimination under the Unruh Civil Rights Act if it refuses to provide medical services for religious reasons without immediately providing a referral to an accommodating hospital.