Menu
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Articles
ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom®

Liberty Institute Files EEOC Charge of Discrimination on Behalf of Dr. Eric Walsh

Posted on September 29, 2014September 29, 2014 by ReligiousLiberty.TV


Liberty Institute and the law firm of Parks, Chesin & Walbert have filed a discrimination charge against the Georgia Department of Health with the EEOC on behalf of Dr. Eric Walsh who was denied employment due to his expression of his religious beliefs.  The following press release was issued September 23, 2014 by Liberty Institute. Liberty Institute is a non-denominational organization that bills itself as “the nation’s largest legal organization exclusively dedicated to defending religious liberty in America.”   The Georgia Department of Health has indicated that it will be responding to the charges shortly.  We will be following the progress of this case as it proceeds.

Press Release – Eric Walsh Liberty Institute

ATLANTA, GA, September 23, 2014-Today, Liberty Institute and Parks, Chesin & Walbert, attorneys for Dr. Eric Walsh, a leading public health expert, who holds both a medical degree and Ph.D. and serves as lay minister with the Seventh Day Adventist Church, filed an official charge of discrimination with the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Georgia Department of Health offered Dr. Walsh a job in May, which he accepted, announced his employment publicly, but then top officials laughed about their decision to terminate his position as Director of Public Health for the region of northeast Georgia based upon Dr. Walsh’s religious beliefs. Listen to the voicemail here: https://libertyinstitute.org/walsh#voicemail.

 

“No one should be fired for simply expressing his religious beliefs,” said Andrew Coffman, partner in the law firm of Parks, Chesin & Walbert and a Liberty Institute volunteer attorney.  “In America, it is against the law to fire an employee for expressing his religious beliefs-especially when that expression takes place at church.  This kind of religious intolerance by an employer has no place in today’s workforce.”

 

Dr. Walsh, among the first of his family to go to college, was eminently qualified to lead the Georgia Department of Health, but has now been effectively blacklisted by the Georgia Department of Health because of religious messages he gave as a lay minister.  According to the Charge of Discrimination filed today with the EEOC, Dr. Walsh was the focus of California activists, dissatisfied with his selection as a speaker at the graduation ceremony for Pasadena City College.  A mean-spirited campaign that intentionally twisted Dr. Walsh’s religious beliefs ultimately resulted in his forced resignation as the Director of Public Health for the City of Pasadena.

 

“This kind of intolerance has no place in today’s workforce,” stated Jeremy Dys, Senior Counsel for Liberty Institute.   “People of faith ought to be respected at work, not fired for expressing their religious beliefs at church.”

 

A copy of Dr. Walsh’s EEOC complaint, the statement in support of his charge of discrimination, and other information, including a picture of Dr. Walsh, is available at https://libertyinstitute.org/walsh
The EEOC will now begin an independent investigation of Dr. Walsh’s charges of religious discrimination and retaliation.  Should the EEOC agree that the Georgia Department of Health is guilty of religious discrimination, it may order broad relief, including back pay, front pay, and other significant damages for the unlawful conduct of Dr. Walsh’s one-time employer.

###

 

 

  • @advanceliberty
  • Adventist
  • eeoc
  • Eric Walsh
  • freedom of speech
  • Liberty Institute
  • religious discrimination
  • religious freedom
  • religious liberty
  • workplace religious freedom
  • 5 thoughts on “Liberty Institute Files EEOC Charge of Discrimination on Behalf of Dr. Eric Walsh”

    1. Janette 152855 says:
      October 15, 2014 at 6:05 pm

      Dr. Eric Walsh is certainly qualified for the Director of Public Health position, so I don’t see why he was fired for “expressing his religious beliefs.” The first amendment in the Bill of Rights clearly says that every citizen has the right to believe in any religion they desire, so why should employers be allowed to fire someone based on their personal religious beliefs. If the national government cannot interfere with these civil liberties, employers should definitely not interfere with them. America uses the system of meritocracy, meaning that those that are qualified are hired. Moreover, Dr. Walsh was not imposing or preaching his religion, so he should not be fired.

      1. sarahi says:
        October 15, 2014 at 8:46 pm

        I agree with this. Freedom of religion is a 1st amendment right that all people have in the United States. Dr.Walsh should be able to openly express his religious beliefs, especially because he is a minister, without it affecting his possible working position.

    2. Bryan Flores says:
      October 19, 2014 at 10:53 pm

      It is shocking to see that even in a highly renowned state governmental institute there could be discrimination. Dr. Walsh is qualified to hold that position and there should not be any other factor contributing to his employment. If he is qualified he deserves to hold that position. In accordance with the 1st amendment it is illegal for any type of institution to discriminate against an individual because of their religion. The free exercise clause protects individuals from religious persecution and as such Dr. Walsh has had his rights infringed upon and should be compensated for this injustice.

      1. Art says:
        October 26, 2014 at 7:39 pm

        i agree on this statement because i believe it is held in within ones right to believe what they want and should be protected under the 1st amendment.

    3. Art says:
      October 26, 2014 at 7:28 pm

      Dr.Walash is entilted to religious freedom and his expression according to the 1st amendment stated by my fellow student Bryan i believe that this is a protected right and that discrimnation should be unheld based on individual and theier view on religion. Dr.Walsh was in no way preaching or go against other religions and should attain to his job. This is a way of seeing a social injustice to America and to the free exercise clause in protection of religious freedom.

    Comments are closed.

    Tweets by RelLibertyTV

    Recent Posts

    • Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

      Colorado Court: Baker Must Provide "Non-Expressive" Cake to Transgender Customer

      January 30, 2023
    • Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

      Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy

      January 13, 2023
    • Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

      Analysis of AB 2098 and Its Potential to Suppress Free Speech of Medical Professionals in California

      January 11, 2023
    • Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

      Idaho Supreme Court Denies Petition to Recognize Fundamental Right to Abortion

      January 9, 2023
    • Exploring the Potential Risks of CBDC - Privacy, Freedom and Economy Impacts

      Exploring the Potential Risks of CBDC - Privacy, Freedom and Economy Impacts

      December 29, 2022

    We are not a law firm, do not provide any legal services, legal advice or “lawyer referral services” and do not provide or participate in any legal representation.

    ©2023 ReligiousLiberty.TV / Founders' First Freedom® | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}