Protestors Lack First Amendment Right to Block Private Property says Arizona Appeals Court

Judges rule that religious freedom does not grant protestors the right to block private property or bypass criminal prosecution.

TLDR

The Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that the state did not violate the Free Exercise of Religion Act (FERA) by arresting and prosecuting protestors at a Raytheon facility. While the court acknowledged the protestors acted on sincerely held religious beliefs, it held that the state has a compelling interest in protecting private property and public peace. The court determined that arrest and prosecution were the least restrictive means to achieve these goals. The decision clarifies that law enforcement is not required to wait indefinitely for protestors to leave. It also affirms that courts will not interfere with a prosecutor’s decision to bring charges. This case establishes clear boundaries between religious exercise and private property rights in Arizona. 

Case Information