Lillian Ladele v. Islington Council

A marriage registrar was discriminated against on grounds of religious beliefs and harassed when required to conduct same-sex civil partnership ceremonies.

ReligiousLiberty.TV
February 26, 2026
0 min read
Cite This Case
Lillian Ladele v. Islington Council (2008).
✓ Copied! Standard law review / practitioner format. Verify against current Bluebook edition (21st ed.).

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Lillian Ladele v. Islington Council (State Appellate Court, 2008). https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/ladele-v-islington-council/
✓ Copied! For legal scholarship in social science journals. Includes URL back to this case page.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Lillian Ladele v. Islington Council [State Appellate Court, 2008] — A marriage registrar was discriminated against on grounds of religious beliefs and harassed when required to conduct same-sex civil partnership ceremonies. Source: ReligiousLiberty.TV (https://religiousliberty.tv/case-library/ladele-v-islington-council/, accessed April 11, 2026).
✓ Copied! For general audiences, journalism, press releases, and non-legal writing.

⚠ No official reporter citation found for this case. Citation quality will improve once a reporter citation (e.g. 573 U.S. 682) is added to the case record.

Year: 2008 Court: State Appellate Court
Holding: A marriage registrar was discriminated against on grounds of religious beliefs and harassed when required to conduct same-sex civil partnership ceremonies.
Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Lillian Ladele v. Islington Council is a Free Exercise case decided by the State Appellate Court in 2008. The court held that a marriage registrar was discriminated against on grounds of religious beliefs and harassed when required to conduct same-sex civil partnership ceremonies.