Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison

Accommodating an employee’s religious observance of the Seventh-day Sabbath would create undue hardship for the airline.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026

0 min read

Citation: 432 U.S. 63 Year: 1977

Free Exercise Workplace Accommodation

Holding: Accommodating an employee's religious observance of the Seventh-day Sabbath would create undue hardship for the airline.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

No official documents found yet.

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 opinion

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Workplace Religious Accommodation Cases April 6, 2021

Cited as context
BREAKING: Supreme Court Ruling in Groff v. Dejoy Clarifies Religious Accommodation Requirements under Title VII June 29, 2023

Cited as context
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Accommodating Religious Practices in the Workplace: Groff v. DeJoy Case Update April 21, 2023

Cited as context
Founders’ First Freedom files Amicus Brief in US Supreme Court in Support of Workplace Religious Freedom March 26, 2023

Cited as context
Supreme Court to Hear Christian Postal Employee Religious Discrimination Claim - Groff v. DeJoy January 13, 2023

Cited as context
Founders’ First Freedom urges Supreme Court to Restore Title VII Workplace Religious Accommodation Standard August 5, 2020

Cited as context
10th Cir. reverses summary judgment in Title VII Sabbath accommodation case January 19, 2018

Cited as context

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump607 U.S. ____ (2026) (2026)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
The President cannot use emergency statutes to bypass Congress for actions of vast economic or political significance without…
3
Doe XXV v. Archdiocese of New York, Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, and Our Lady of Mount Carmel School2026 NY Slip Op 30269(U) (2026)
3
State Appellate Court
Neutral principles of negligent hiring and supervision apply to religious institutions; First Amendment does not shield religious organizations…
4
New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.25-40102-FDS (2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pro-Religion
A DHS policy permitting warrantless immigration enforcement at churches violates RFRA by substantially burdening religious exercise without using…
📄 Opinion available
5
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
6
Groff v. DeJoy600 U.S. 447 (2023)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Employers cannot deny religious accommodation to workers unless it causes substantial increased costs or burdens on business operations.
📄 Opinion available
7
Bill 21 (Supreme Court of Canada Appeal)(2026)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
8
Troogstad v. City of Chicago25-1575 (2025)
2
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate how a COVID-19 vaccine mandate burdened their specific religious practices under the Free Exercise…
📄 Opinion available
9
Wailes v. Jefferson County Public Schools(2025)
2
Remanded
District court dismissal of parents' challenge to school's policy of assigning students to overnight accommodations based on gender…
📄 Opinion available
10
Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. Nick Brown24-7246 (2026)
2
The First Amendment's church autonomy doctrine extends beyond the ministerial exception to protect a religious organization's decision to…
📄 Opinion available