Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

Religious liberty protections under RFRA apply to closely held for-profit corporations.

ReligiousLiberty.TV

February 26, 2026

0 min read

Citation: 573 U.S. 682 Year: 2014 Court: U.S. Supreme Court

Free Exercise Healthcare & Conscience

Holding: Religious liberty protections under RFRA apply to closely held for-profit corporations.

Uses AI to generate a structured summary. Takes ~10 seconds.

Official Documents

📄 Read Opinion Article link

Coverage on ReligiousLiberty.TV

📎 Document links found in our articles: 📄 scotusblog.com opinion

Religious Liberty: The "Constitutional Veto" on Collectivism January 9, 2026

Cited as context
Religious Liberty: The "Constitutional Veto" on Collectivism January 8, 2026

Cited as context
Kennedy v. Braidwood Management: Faith-Based Challenge to HIV Prevention Coverage Reaches Supreme Court April 21, 2025

Cited as context
Academic Review: Separation of Church and Business: A Look at Corporate Disestablishment September 22, 2024

Cited as context
Academic Review: Separation of Church and Business: A Look at Corporate Disestablishment September 21, 2024

Cited as context
Court rules agency can decide if employers must provide contraceptive coverage July 10, 2020

Cited as context
Legal Analysis: Zubik petitioners may have pushed argument too far March 24, 2016

Cited as context 📎 Oyez opinion
When Legislation Fails, Gov Jindal Orders 'Protection of Conscience' June 25, 2015

Cited as context
Arizona Governor Vetoes SB 1062 February 27, 2014

Cited as context
Arizona SB 1062 is a Bad Idea and Should Be Vetoed! February 26, 2014

Cited as context
Standing Firm For Faith While Seeking Mutually Acceptable Solutions - Is it Possible to Peacefully Resolve the Religious Wars in America's Marketplace? February 20, 2014

Cited as context
Arguments scheduled on whether RFRA allows employers to limit contraceptive coverage January 13, 2014

Primary coverage 📎 scotusblog.com opinion

1
Mahmoud v. Taylor606 U.S. 522 (2025)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children without state interference.
📄 Opinion available
2
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump607 U.S. ____ (2026) (2026)
3
U.S. Supreme Court
The President cannot use emergency statutes to bypass Congress for actions of vast economic or political significance without…
3
Doe XXV v. Archdiocese of New York, Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, and Our Lady of Mount Carmel School2026 NY Slip Op 30269(U) (2026)
3
State Appellate Court
Neutral principles of negligent hiring and supervision apply to religious institutions; First Amendment does not shield religious organizations…
4
New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.25-40102-FDS (2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pro-Religion
A DHS policy permitting warrantless immigration enforcement at churches violates RFRA by substantially burdening religious exercise without using…
📄 Opinion available
5
United States v. Don Lemon(2026)
2
U.S. District Court
Pending
The government indicted Don Lemon under the FACE Act for alleged coordination in disrupting religious worship, though judges…
6
Groff v. DeJoy600 U.S. 447 (2023)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Employers cannot deny religious accommodation to workers unless it causes substantial increased costs or burdens on business operations.
📄 Opinion available
7
Bill 21 (Supreme Court of Canada Appeal)(2026)
2
U.S. Supreme Court
Pending
8
Troogstad v. City of Chicago25-1575 (2025)
2
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate how a COVID-19 vaccine mandate burdened their specific religious practices under the Free Exercise…
📄 Opinion available
9
Wailes v. Jefferson County Public Schools(2025)
2
Remanded
District court dismissal of parents' challenge to school's policy of assigning students to overnight accommodations based on gender…
📄 Opinion available
10
Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. Nick Brown24-7246 (2026)
2
The First Amendment's church autonomy doctrine extends beyond the ministerial exception to protect a religious organization's decision to…
📄 Opinion available