Prof. Daniel Crane – “A Judeo-Christian Argument for Privatizing Marriage” (Cardozo Law Review)
In this law review article, Cardozo Law School professor Daniel Crane argues that marriage has traditionally been in the province of faith, not of the state, and that this should be taken into consideration when evaluating proposed marriage amendments. The full article is available in PDF format at http://www.cardozolawreview.com/PastIssues/CRANE.WEBSITE.pdf Here is a brief excerpt (citations […]
Read MoreJohn Stevens responds to Prof. Daniel Crane’s article on privatizing marriage
-
John Stevens
- July 19, 2008
- advocate
- California Supreme Court Marriage Amendment
- christian argument
- Christianity
- conscience
- constitutional amendments
- gay marriage
- homosexual marriage
- marriage
- private institutions
- professor crane
- religious affiliation
- same sex union
- same sex unions
- Same-Sex Marriage
- worship services
John V. Stevens, Sr., an experienced religious liberty advocate, responds to Professor Crane’s article “A Judeo-Christian Argument for Privatizing Marriage” from his perspective as a Seventh-day Adventist. He has provided his kind permission to reproduce it here. I hope that this can be a springboard for discussion on this important issue facing all Americans regardless […]
Read More