Guns, Banks, and the Beast: Unpacking the Supreme Court’s Latest Ruling
-
ReligiousLiberty.TV
- June 1, 2024
- advocacy groups
- banking access
- constitutional rights
- de-banking
- de-banking consequences
- financial access
- financial discrimination
- financial exclusion
- financial freedom
- financial institutions
- financial oversight.
- financial regulation
- financial services industry
- First Amendment
- Free Speech
- gun rights
- legal implications
- legal precedent
- New York State Department of Financial Services
- NRA banking issues
- regulatory overreach
- religious liberty
- risk management
- Second Amendment
- Vullo case
- Vullo v. NRA
The Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in Vullo v. NRA underscores the illegality of using regulatory power to coerce financial institutions to de-bank organizations based on their political beliefs, reinforcing free speech protections.
Read More
Supreme Court Unanimous: Government Officials Cannot Leverage their Positions to Suppress Dissent
The implications of this case are profound and far-reaching. It sends a clear message to regulatory bodies nationwide: exercise your power cautiously, for the line between guidance and coercion is perilously thin. Vullo’s actions were perceived as an attack on the NRA’s very right to exist and advocate.
Read More
The Fragility of the Constitution: A Warning Against Taking It for Granted
The Constitution is not invincible. It is a fragile document that can be destroyed by those seeking temporary gain.
Read More
California Lifeguard Sues Over Pride Flag Mandate: A Case of Religious Discrimination?
A veteran lifeguard in Los Angeles County, Jeffrey Little, has filed a lawsuit against the county, alleging religious discrimination. The case stems from an incident where Little removed LGBTQ+ Pride flags from his lifeguard tower, arguing that their presence contradicted his Christian beliefs.According to the lawsuit, Little claims he was subjected to a hostile work […]
Read More
Pending Supreme Court Decision Could Redefine Free Speech Online
The Supreme Court will soon decide Moody v. NetChoice, LLC & NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, addressing whether social media platforms can ban content based on political or religious views.
Read More
Why We Must Stand Against Anti-Semitism in Our Time
Exploring the rise of antisemitism in the political spectrum, from the far right to the far left. How dangerous rhetoric fuels hatred and violence.
Read More
Supreme Court clarifies threshold for employment discrimination harm under Title VII
In a landmark ruling, the US Supreme Court redefines the standard for Title VII lawsuits, stating “some harm” is sufficient. Details in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis.
Read More
Indiana Court Weighs Rights of Transgender Students Against Teacher’s Religious Beliefs
The U.S. District Court Southern District of Indiana found that the “last names only” accommodation presented an undue burden not overcome by Groff when it caused “substantial student harm, and an unreasonable risk of liability” while “sharply contradicting the school’s legally entitled mission to foster a supportive environment for all.”
Read More
Uneven Approach to Law is Threat to Survival of America’s Cities
Explore the paradoxical enforcement of laws in cities like San Francisco, where parking violations are strictly punished while dangerous property damage from outdoor fires goes unaddressed.
Read More
Australia v. Elon Musk: Free Speech and an Abundance of Arrogance
Wakeley, a Sydney suburb far from tourist hotspots, became the center of a global debate on freedom of speech after a terrorist attack on Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel. The Australian eSafety Commissioner ordered the removal of graphic footage from social media, sparking controversy with tech billionaire Elon Musk. Should such content be censored globally? The debate rages on.
Read More